Developmental Work Research: A Search for Congruence
This paper will explore the potential of Developmental Work Research (DWR) as a method of enhancing collaborative creativity or problem-solving within youth and community work teams. Underpinned by cultural historical activity theory (CHAT), DWR has frequently been used as a method of examining work practices, identifying change, and imagining new ways of working (expansive learning) within the health, education and social care-based professions.
DWR is characterised as intervention-based research where a collaborative examination of the contradictions and disturbances within a CHAT activity system leads to transformations in practice at both team and individual levels. Such contradictions and disturbances are deep-seated structural tensions, often maintained by the cultural historicity of the system, and which manifest as visible problems or conflicts. It is the solution-focused examination of these that is the main work of the DWR process, and which provides a workshop-based, interactive environment where participants can work together through a facilitated ‘past, present and future’ timeline which acknowledges their contextual cultural historical traditions.
The DWR method supported recent doctoral research where it was used to examine how youth workers have responded to technological changes within the last 40 years, the incorporation of new technologies into current practice, and what this might mean for future practice. This experience will be used to reflect on the use of DWR as a qualitative research method compatible with youth and community work ethics and values and congruent with the training and group work contexts with which youth and community workers are familiar.
Full Text:Full Text
Ackerman, E. 2002. Piaget's Constructivism, Papert's Constuctionism: What's the Difference? Available: http://learning.media.mit.edu/content/publications/EA.Piaget%20_%20Papert.pdf
Batsleer, J. (2010) Ethical Issues in Practitioner and Participatory Research. IN BANKS, S. (Ed.) Ethical Issues in Youth Work. 2 ed. Abingdon, Routledge.
Capper, P. & Williams, B. (2004). Enhancing Evaluation Using Systems Concepts. [Online]. http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/Systems_Resources_files/activity.pdf: www.bobwilliams.co.nz. [Accessed 24.10.16 2016].
Cassens, J. & Kofod-Petersen, A. Year. Using Activity Theory to Model Context Awareness: A Qualitative Case Study. In: 19th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, 2006 Florida, USA. AAAI Press 619–624.
Crotty, M. (1998) The Foundations of Social Research, London, Sage Publications Ltd.
Daniels, H. (2008) Vygotsky and research, London ; New York, Routledge.
Davies, T. & Cranston, P. (2008) Youth Work and Social Networking Final Report. Leicester, National Youth Agency.
Dewey, J. (1916) Democracy and Education : An introduction to the Philosophy of Education, Teddington, Echo Library.
Ellis, V. (2010) Studying the Process of Change. IN ELLIS, V., EDWARDS, A. & SMAGORINSKY, P. (Eds.) Cultural-Historical Perspectives on Teacher Education and Development. Abingdon, Routledge.
Engestrom, Y. (1987) Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Orienta-Konsultit.
Engestrom, Y. (2015) Learning by expanding : an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research, New York, NY, Cambridge University Press.
Engestrom, Y., Miettinen, R. & Punamaki, R. (1999) Perspectives on Activity Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Engestrom, Y. & Young, M. (2001) Expansive learning at work : toward an activity-theoretical reconceptualisation, London, University of London.
Hickman, L. (1990) John Dewey's pragmatic technology, Bloomington, Ind., Indiana University Press.
James, W. (Ed.) (1907, 1981,) Pragmatism, Indianopolis ; Cambridge, Hackett.
Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B. A. & Ebrary, I. (2006) Acting with technology : activity theory and interaction design, Cambridge, Mass. ; London, MIT Press.
Kolb, D. A. (1984) Experiential learning : experience as the source of learning and development, Englewood Cliffs ; London, Prentice-Hall.
Kolb, D. A. & Fry, R. (1975) Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. IN COOPER, C. L. (Ed.) Theories of Group Process. London, John Wiley.
Kuutti, K. (1996) Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. IN NARDI, B. (Ed.) Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA., MIT press.
Lewin, K. (1947) The Research Center for Group Dynamics, [New York], Beacon House.
Author (2012) Using Activity Theory to Explain How Youth Workers Use Digital Media to Meet Curriculum Outcomes. Unpublished work., University of Brighton.
Miettinen, R. (2006) Epistemology of Transformative Material Activity: John Dewey's Pragmatism and Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36 (4), 389-408.
Nardi, B. A. (1996) Context and consciousness : activity theory and human-computer interaction, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
Price, S., Jewitt, C. & Brown, B. (2013) The SAGE handbook of digital technology research.
Robertson, S. 2009. Leslie Button and developmental group work. Available: http://infed.org/mobi/leslie-button-and-developmental-group-work/ [Accessed 30.4.17.]
Rogers, C. (1961) On Becoming a Person, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company.
Russell, D. (2004) Looking beyond the interface: activity theory and distributed learning. IN DANIELS, H. & EDWARDS, A. (Eds.) The Routledge Falmer Reader in the Psychology of Education. London, Routledge Falmer.
Talisse, R. B. & Aikin, S. F. (2008) Pragmatism : a guide for the perplexed, London, Continuum.
Vygotsky, L. S. & Cole, M. (1978) Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, Mass. ; London, Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S., Rieber, R. W. & Wollock, J. L. (1997) The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, New York ; London, Plenum.
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.